dreampiler/kandev
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 43 Pull Requests Actions 6 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Bound automatic continuation of unresolved durable work #83

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-10-14 06:28:03 +09:00 by dreampiler · 10 comments
dreampiler commented 2026-10-14 06:28:03 +09:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Merge into existing open task44e94a1b scope3, no duplicate task. Operations reports repeated fork112f92225c continue_from_history for AIWS09538ccf/sessionc15efc9e and the same unresolved_durable_work, more than10 launches while in predecessor waiting, each admitted origin manual. Confirm source/runtime membership and compare merged #287 before changing origin classification. Bound attempts for the same session and unresolved durable record; verify settlement or explicit recovery outcome, and stop for controller/operator handling at the bound. Preserve undelivered SQL/agentctl work and honest success semantics. Decide waiting-step eligibility and fork-fix versus replacement by upstream behavior (R1/R5); source/API/isolated repro and minimal design checkpoint first. Preserve PR2/control_workflow_ids and PR1 owner85af3f4b. Same-task separate PR for this failure chain, no blocker dependency on CMwatch or inbox-cleanup. Coordinate fourth-swap inclusion with operating owner after head/review/merge timing. No operating stop/restart, DB writes, new fingerprints, recurring gates or CI. Assigned worktree and canonical isolated BinDir only; upstream writes via93c6b4d0/W091.

Merge into existing open task44e94a1b scope3, no duplicate task. Operations reports repeated fork112f92225c continue_from_history for AIWS09538ccf/sessionc15efc9e and the same unresolved_durable_work, more than10 launches while in predecessor waiting, each admitted origin manual. Confirm source/runtime membership and compare merged #287 before changing origin classification. Bound attempts for the same session and unresolved durable record; verify settlement or explicit recovery outcome, and stop for controller/operator handling at the bound. Preserve undelivered SQL/agentctl work and honest success semantics. Decide waiting-step eligibility and fork-fix versus replacement by upstream behavior (R1/R5); source/API/isolated repro and minimal design checkpoint first. Preserve PR2/control_workflow_ids and PR1 owner85af3f4b. Same-task separate PR for this failure chain, no blocker dependency on CMwatch or inbox-cleanup. Coordinate fourth-swap inclusion with operating owner after head/review/merge timing. No operating stop/restart, DB writes, new fingerprints, recurring gates or CI. Assigned worktree and canonical isolated BinDir only; upstream writes via93c6b4d0/W091.
dreampiler commented 2026-10-15 01:42:11 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Root source and runtime readback: unresolved_durable_work blocks a new prompt while earlier durable work is unsettled; dynamic_route_pending blocks automatic resume on a non-active dynamic route. Installed94 already has partial continuation and route-reclaim helpers. Existing task44e scope3 remains incomplete: PR327 corrects agent-origin admission only; per-record bounded retries, verified settlement, hold eligibility and ordinary MCP cold-resume origin remain required. Preserve original queue and task; do not mark the whole goal complete after PR327. Current cc6 prompt-unready cleanup ownership conflict is separately being investigated by existing lifecycle task30da. No duplicate task, new gate or standing tests.

Root source and runtime readback: unresolved_durable_work blocks a new prompt while earlier durable work is unsettled; dynamic_route_pending blocks automatic resume on a non-active dynamic route. Installed94 already has partial continuation and route-reclaim helpers. Existing task44e scope3 remains incomplete: PR327 corrects agent-origin admission only; per-record bounded retries, verified settlement, hold eligibility and ordinary MCP cold-resume origin remain required. Preserve original queue and task; do not mark the whole goal complete after PR327. Current cc6 prompt-unready cleanup ownership conflict is separately being investigated by existing lifecycle task30da. No duplicate task, new gate or standing tests.
dreampiler commented 2026-10-15 14:35:14 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Controller 8e3eb6b7, 2026-10-15: linked to the updated canonical target design (AIWS PR546, main 22ad9a15; 20_통합설계서.md §0, 명세/02 §0.3, 명세/11 §0). Fork PRs #327/#332/#337 stay merged as operating-recovery source (in the 1cab candidate); this note does not claim operating installation or R-1 acceptance, which remain open with the release/deploy flow, and PR1 requeue ownership stays with 85af. Upstream destination changes: the deferred-launch / bounded interrupted-turn recovery parts are 11 §0 step 2 general fixes (session succession, delivery/settlement, error waits) to port onto a fresh latest-upstream clone after the step-0 report is approved. The control-lane-by-workflow grading of #337 is NOT the upstream target: 02 §0.3 replaces role-specific work/control reservation with one global concurrent AI cap plus explicit per-execution-grade caps (11 §0 step 3), so #337 is not ported as-is. No new fork product code.

Controller 8e3eb6b7, 2026-10-15: linked to the updated canonical target design (AIWS PR546, main 22ad9a15; 20_통합설계서.md §0, 명세/02 §0.3, 명세/11 §0). Fork PRs #327/#332/#337 stay merged as operating-recovery source (in the 1cab candidate); this note does not claim operating installation or R-1 acceptance, which remain open with the release/deploy flow, and PR1 requeue ownership stays with 85af. Upstream destination changes: the deferred-launch / bounded interrupted-turn recovery parts are 11 §0 step 2 general fixes (session succession, delivery/settlement, error waits) to port onto a fresh latest-upstream clone after the step-0 report is approved. The control-lane-by-workflow grading of #337 is NOT the upstream target: 02 §0.3 replaces role-specific work/control reservation with one global concurrent AI cap plus explicit per-execution-grade caps (11 §0 step 3), so #337 is not ported as-is. No new fork product code.
dreampiler commented 2026-10-16 03:27:25 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

[상태관리 2026-10-15 18:26 UTC / 기존44e 원목표 잔여 연결]
44e94a1b COMPLETED는 fork #327/#332/#337 산출물 및 당시 R-1 수용 몫이다. 원목표 전체 완료/후발결함 해소가 아니다. 원Goal1의 0d554505 사례: 16:39:49 정상move→16:39:58 automatic start ceiling_control defer→16:40:08 ceiling_superseded/workflow destination step changed drop→같은SID5e4624fa guardedresume16:44:44→16:44:47.972 첫tool→16:55:55 원작업COMPLETED. 개별회피와제품재발해소를구분한다. 원incident/복구receipt는 C:/Users/dream/Documents/Codex/2026-10-15/task/ops-0d-ceiling-drop-incident.md 및 ops-0d-same-session-recovery.json.
이 원큐 본문 scope3(continue_from_history 반복상한)와 이 Goal1 entry-drop은 서로다른미완료부분이다. 새task로나누거나원queue를닫지않는다. 귀속: 원큐요구·판정8e3eb6b7(Plan1dfe864a), 운영회피는task1상태관리, native코드는부모가정확범위를배정할때기존task3단일writer. 44ePlan26bf4af7에도원목표미완/후속연결완료. 다음조치=이미보유한한건deferred payload(binding/step/entry/operation)와enqueue/drop당시committedroute/transition을대조해최소원인판정. 복수분기동일문구때문에정확predicate는미확정이며RR/C2c/#295에해소를귀속하지않는다. 'nativecapreplay1행'은배정·구현완료증거가아니다. 원담당회신 sent/codex_8e_44e_autocontinue_link_1016.md 인수. 새writer/task/중복wake/테스트/코드/배포/재시작0. 원큐statecreated/열림유지.

[상태관리 2026-10-15 18:26 UTC / 기존44e 원목표 잔여 연결] 44e94a1b COMPLETED는 fork #327/#332/#337 산출물 및 당시 R-1 수용 몫이다. 원목표 전체 완료/후발결함 해소가 아니다. 원Goal1의 0d554505 사례: 16:39:49 정상move→16:39:58 automatic start ceiling_control defer→16:40:08 ceiling_superseded/workflow destination step changed drop→같은SID5e4624fa guardedresume16:44:44→16:44:47.972 첫tool→16:55:55 원작업COMPLETED. 개별회피와제품재발해소를구분한다. 원incident/복구receipt는 C:/Users/dream/Documents/Codex/2026-10-15/task/ops-0d-ceiling-drop-incident.md 및 ops-0d-same-session-recovery.json. 이 원큐 본문 scope3(continue_from_history 반복상한)와 이 Goal1 entry-drop은 서로다른미완료부분이다. 새task로나누거나원queue를닫지않는다. 귀속: 원큐요구·판정8e3eb6b7(Plan1dfe864a), 운영회피는task1상태관리, native코드는부모가정확범위를배정할때기존task3단일writer. 44ePlan26bf4af7에도원목표미완/후속연결완료. 다음조치=이미보유한한건deferred payload(binding/step/entry/operation)와enqueue/drop당시committedroute/transition을대조해최소원인판정. 복수분기동일문구때문에정확predicate는미확정이며RR/C2c/#295에해소를귀속하지않는다. 'nativecapreplay1행'은배정·구현완료증거가아니다. 원담당회신 sent/codex_8e_44e_autocontinue_link_1016.md 인수. 새writer/task/중복wake/테스트/코드/배포/재시작0. 원큐statecreated/열림유지.
dreampiler commented 2026-10-20 21:25:19 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

[FU-1014 재판정 2026-10-20 · 읽기 전용]

  1. scope3(같은 세션 continue_from_history 자동 반복) — native 에서 생길 수 없음 확정.
  • session_launch.go:246-250 ForceContextContinuation 은 RecoverSession 전용, :1426-1441 이 값을 true 로 놓는 유일한 지점, :1346-1349 user-initiated. handlers/handlers.go:494-495 의 session.recover 명시 action 만 통과. 자동 restore 는 session.go:358 / manager_workspace_rebind.go:82 / session_restore_policy.go:191 모두 RestoreActionNativeResume.
  • 반복은 fork 커밋 112f92225(2026-10-11, background 자동 continue fallback)가 10-15 빌드 28aacb 에 들어가 생긴 것. 이 커밋과 후속 bound/origin 수정은 현재 설치판 c905ca7ed 와 upstream main 에 없다. native 수정 0.
  1. 0d554505 entry-drop — 결함 확정.
  • step a5f98050=완료, c6993cd4=구현. transition 17744 16:39:58.537 mcp_move 완료→구현. 16:44 readback 은 task.step=c6993cd4 인데 workflow_session_route.destination_step_id=a5f98050/entry 17732(이전 entry). 16:40:08.770 drop kind=start ceiling_superseded detail="workflow destination step changed".
  • 원인: start deferral payload 는 step c6993cd4/entry 17744 인데 route 는 destination promotion 전이라 이전 entry 로 stale. deriveCeilingEntryBinding 이 route step 불일치로 binding 미생성(ceiling_entry.go:149-152, :181-188), sweep unbound 검증이 payload step 을 stale route 와 비교해 폐기(:713-714). settle 문구가 아니므로 사전 검증 폐기.
  • 미확인: 폐기 시 record clear 로 payload JSON 미보존(코드 경로+ledger 로 조합 추정). 10-15 원 로그는 로테이션으로 없음(사고 문서 전재만).
  • 영향: 정상 현재 entry 기동이 영구 폐기, 16:44 수동 resume 로 복구. 데이터 손실 없음.
  1. 최소 수정안(구현 안 함): apps/backend/internal/orchestrator/ceiling_entry.go 의 validateCeilingEntryWithDestinationState unbound 분기에서 payload workflow_entry_id>0 == task 현재 WorkflowStepTransitionID 이고 task.WorkflowStepID==payloadStepID 이면 stale route step 비교로 supersede 하지 말고 validateCeilingDestination 만 확인 후 valid. 기존 오래된 entry/무-entry 폐기는 유지. 동행 순수 단위 시험 4건 계획에 명시.

남은 결정: 수정 담당(인수 세션 vs fork 수정 PR)은 관제 8e(8e3eb6b7)가 정한다. upstream 게시는 하지 않는다. 코드 수정·브랜치·PR·게시 0. Plan: task ebb06921 v1bfdf27f. 이 항목은 아직 수정 전이므로 flow 종결하지 않는다.

[FU-1014 재판정 2026-10-20 · 읽기 전용] 1) scope3(같은 세션 continue_from_history 자동 반복) — native 에서 생길 수 없음 확정. - session_launch.go:246-250 ForceContextContinuation 은 RecoverSession 전용, :1426-1441 이 값을 true 로 놓는 유일한 지점, :1346-1349 user-initiated. handlers/handlers.go:494-495 의 session.recover 명시 action 만 통과. 자동 restore 는 session.go:358 / manager_workspace_rebind.go:82 / session_restore_policy.go:191 모두 RestoreActionNativeResume. - 반복은 fork 커밋 112f92225(2026-10-11, background 자동 continue fallback)가 10-15 빌드 28aacb 에 들어가 생긴 것. 이 커밋과 후속 bound/origin 수정은 현재 설치판 c905ca7ed 와 upstream main 에 없다. native 수정 0. 2) 0d554505 entry-drop — 결함 확정. - step a5f98050=완료, c6993cd4=구현. transition 17744 16:39:58.537 mcp_move 완료→구현. 16:44 readback 은 task.step=c6993cd4 인데 workflow_session_route.destination_step_id=a5f98050/entry 17732(이전 entry). 16:40:08.770 drop kind=start ceiling_superseded detail="workflow destination step changed". - 원인: start deferral payload 는 step c6993cd4/entry 17744 인데 route 는 destination promotion 전이라 이전 entry 로 stale. deriveCeilingEntryBinding 이 route step 불일치로 binding 미생성(ceiling_entry.go:149-152, :181-188), sweep unbound 검증이 payload step 을 stale route 와 비교해 폐기(:713-714). settle 문구가 아니므로 사전 검증 폐기. - 미확인: 폐기 시 record clear 로 payload JSON 미보존(코드 경로+ledger 로 조합 추정). 10-15 원 로그는 로테이션으로 없음(사고 문서 전재만). - 영향: 정상 현재 entry 기동이 영구 폐기, 16:44 수동 resume 로 복구. 데이터 손실 없음. 3) 최소 수정안(구현 안 함): apps/backend/internal/orchestrator/ceiling_entry.go 의 validateCeilingEntryWithDestinationState unbound 분기에서 payload workflow_entry_id>0 == task 현재 WorkflowStepTransitionID 이고 task.WorkflowStepID==payloadStepID 이면 stale route step 비교로 supersede 하지 말고 validateCeilingDestination 만 확인 후 valid. 기존 오래된 entry/무-entry 폐기는 유지. 동행 순수 단위 시험 4건 계획에 명시. 남은 결정: 수정 담당(인수 세션 vs fork 수정 PR)은 관제 8e(8e3eb6b7)가 정한다. upstream 게시는 하지 않는다. 코드 수정·브랜치·PR·게시 0. Plan: task ebb06921 v1bfdf27f. 이 항목은 아직 수정 전이므로 flow 종결하지 않는다.
dreampiler commented 2026-10-20 21:57:50 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Controller 8e disposition, 2026-10-20: reuse this existing queue and the 12:25Z defect report; no new queue or task. Operations withdrew its new-registration request at 12:55Z. Owner is the existing native intake session, fourth-package candidate, not a fork PR writer. Preserve the 0d554505 current destination transition 17744 versus stale route entry 17732 evidence and validateCeilingEntryWithDestinationState unbound-branch proposal. Proposed companion units remain: current entry plus stale route accepted, older entry rejected, unidentified sessionless start still terminal, and sweep replays the valid current entry once. These tests are proposals, not executed or newly authorized. No new slice startup or implementation is authorized here. Native scope3 automatic-continuation behavior is superseded; the entry-drop defect remains open until accepted implementation and existing deployment verification. Source: ebb06921 plan e26ac412 and prior FLOW-NOTE-KANDEV-FU-1014-AUTO-CONTINUE-20261020T122527425671Z. Native intake handoff is recorded in sent/codex_8e_restart_reconcile_1020.md; a recorded handoff is not an intake ACK or implementation completion.

Controller 8e disposition, 2026-10-20: reuse this existing queue and the 12:25Z defect report; no new queue or task. Operations withdrew its new-registration request at 12:55Z. Owner is the existing native intake session, fourth-package candidate, not a fork PR writer. Preserve the 0d554505 current destination transition 17744 versus stale route entry 17732 evidence and validateCeilingEntryWithDestinationState unbound-branch proposal. Proposed companion units remain: current entry plus stale route accepted, older entry rejected, unidentified sessionless start still terminal, and sweep replays the valid current entry once. These tests are proposals, not executed or newly authorized. No new slice startup or implementation is authorized here. Native scope3 automatic-continuation behavior is superseded; the entry-drop defect remains open until accepted implementation and existing deployment verification. Source: ebb06921 plan e26ac412 and prior FLOW-NOTE-KANDEV-FU-1014-AUTO-CONTINUE-20261020T122527425671Z. Native intake handoff is recorded in sent/codex_8e_restart_reconcile_1020.md; a recorded handoff is not an intake ACK or implementation completion.
dreampiler commented 2026-10-21 04:17:35 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

KANDEV-FU-1014-AUTO-CONTINUE unit 1/1 result: ceiling entry-drop (stale workflow_session_route) fixed in own copy at base c905ca7ed. Branch codex/kandev-fu-1014-ceiling-stale-route, commit 8a68c4b3596d82aee24c8548c6ad8022247ab4d6 (guard in ceiling_entry.go, 4 in-process tests, workflow-stage-moves design item). Verified: focused tests ok, lint-go-changed 0 issues; 5 full-package failures reproduce on an untouched c905ca7ed worktree (Windows attachment path, restart queue resume, fifo send-now, order-dependent iteration test) and none touch the changed path; temp baseline worktree removed. Remaining: independent review on head 8a68c4b35, K8 bb924d6a integrates the sha into claude/native-work, queue close is cleanup owner. No upstream write.

KANDEV-FU-1014-AUTO-CONTINUE unit 1/1 result: ceiling entry-drop (stale workflow_session_route) fixed in own copy at base c905ca7ed. Branch codex/kandev-fu-1014-ceiling-stale-route, commit 8a68c4b3596d82aee24c8548c6ad8022247ab4d6 (guard in ceiling_entry.go, 4 in-process tests, workflow-stage-moves design item). Verified: focused tests ok, lint-go-changed 0 issues; 5 full-package failures reproduce on an untouched c905ca7ed worktree (Windows attachment path, restart queue resume, fifo send-now, order-dependent iteration test) and none touch the changed path; temp baseline worktree removed. Remaining: independent review on head 8a68c4b35, K8 bb924d6a integrates the sha into claude/native-work, queue close is cleanup owner. No upstream write.
dreampiler commented 2026-10-21 06:57:05 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

KANDEV-FU-1014-AUTO-CONTINUE final: ceiling entry-drop fix complete and independently reviewed. Commits on codex/kandev-fu-1014-ceiling-stale-route from c905ca7ed: 8a68c4b35, d086ca9f4, e82156721; K8 bb924d6a integrates them into claude/native-work. Review 3cb75dea passed with 0 blocking findings; workflow runs 97f2047a and cbc2bd22 were technical failures only, not verdicts. All prior findings (72baad99, 702e6746, e04dada3, 78521ee5) resolved; W116 excluded by control decision and documented at ceiling_entry.go:713-732 vs :737-744. Verification: 9 stale-route unit cases ok, lint-go-changed 0 issues. No fork PR or merge; no upstream write (5d5cbb5b owns that). Non-blocking follow-up noted: a repository permanently lacking the transition-ledger capability keeps reporting unavailable each sweep (test-only; production sqlite implements it). Queue closure is the cleanup owner's job.

KANDEV-FU-1014-AUTO-CONTINUE final: ceiling entry-drop fix complete and independently reviewed. Commits on codex/kandev-fu-1014-ceiling-stale-route from c905ca7ed: 8a68c4b35, d086ca9f4, e82156721; K8 bb924d6a integrates them into claude/native-work. Review 3cb75dea passed with 0 blocking findings; workflow runs 97f2047a and cbc2bd22 were technical failures only, not verdicts. All prior findings (72baad99, 702e6746, e04dada3, 78521ee5) resolved; W116 excluded by control decision and documented at ceiling_entry.go:713-732 vs :737-744. Verification: 9 stale-route unit cases ok, lint-go-changed 0 issues. No fork PR or merge; no upstream write (5d5cbb5b owns that). Non-blocking follow-up noted: a repository permanently lacking the transition-ledger capability keeps reporting unavailable each sweep (test-only; production sqlite implements it). Queue closure is the cleanup owner's job.
dreampiler commented 2026-10-23 01:06:14 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

[VER11-ALIGN-20261023] 최초 요청 원문·기존 flow/issue/이력 보존. 최신 기준 _Knowledge/references/최종목표구조설계_ver11/20_통합설계서.md 및 명세11/13/14, 절차·잔여·비용은42_현행정합_실행절차.md. 2026-10-23 읽기 관측 explicit task: c2374dc7-7b45-41a3-a6bd-60bc4027dce8 (COMPLETED, archived); ebb06921-8f5d-41a1-b658-8838f9f30309 (COMPLETED, archived)
최신 상류/현재운영cb90와 별도local-main 통합 결과를 기존 담당이 대조하여 실제 잔여만 진행. 과거 task COMPLETED·미종결flow·운영결과는 구분하고 같은 구현/시험을 반복하지 않음.
이번 갱신은 결과/다음담당 연결이며 상태 일괄종결·task이동/삭제·모델순서/한도·상시시험·해시 확인 추가0.

[VER11-ALIGN-20261023] 최초 요청 원문·기존 flow/issue/이력 보존. 최신 기준 _Knowledge/references/최종목표구조설계_ver11/20_통합설계서.md 및 명세11/13/14, 절차·잔여·비용은42_현행정합_실행절차.md. 2026-10-23 읽기 관측 explicit task: c2374dc7-7b45-41a3-a6bd-60bc4027dce8 (COMPLETED, archived); ebb06921-8f5d-41a1-b658-8838f9f30309 (COMPLETED, archived) 최신 상류/현재운영cb90와 별도local-main 통합 결과를 기존 담당이 대조하여 실제 잔여만 진행. 과거 task COMPLETED·미종결flow·운영결과는 구분하고 같은 구현/시험을 반복하지 않음. 이번 갱신은 결과/다음담당 연결이며 상태 일괄종결·task이동/삭제·모델순서/한도·상시시험·해시 확인 추가0.
dreampiler commented 2026-10-27 04:36:57 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

[8e receiving acceptance / AUTO-CONTINUE 기존 원단위]
receiving_task=8e3eb6b7-f0fb-4d79-a954-69aeab00993a, currentSIDcd0c5763-321c-418f-97d8-2f23041bbbf0.
수용 대상 flow KANDEV-FU-1014-AUTO-CONTINUE, 기존 source c2374dc7-7b45-41a3-a6bd-60bc4027dce8:agent-delivery-648694917203e3abcb79f2b90241ab5e.
이번 원대화에서 실제 source최종보고(2026-10-20T21:57:53.9102285Z)를읽었고 원sourcePlan ec84c570 및 진단Plan e26ac412, cleanup a4b49c55 Plan c676cfc0의 최신 AUTO-CONTINUE 인수절을 대조했다. 기존수용ref 8e3eb6b7-f0fb-4d79-a954-69aeab00993a:agent-delivery-6347a4e7f0d37a12cc1f05fe3d21c2c9를 재사용한다.
범위: 기존 native scope3는 자동 continue 경로 부재에 따른 기결정 superseded이며 재구현하지 않는다. 남은 ceiling entry-drop의8a68c4b35/d086ca9f4/e82156721 수정·3cb독립검토필수0/9개기존사례·필요lint결과를기존증거로인수한다. K8 B1be 확정입력·canonical intake covered분류 및 기존source/runtime대장의backend반영 기록까지 이미receiving인수가끝난 사실을 source/cleanup최신절에서 확인했다. 옛K8반영대기나새운영재현/전분기자연발생을추가완료관문으로만들지 않는다.
받은원단위는 수정·기존통합/인수·정식큐후처리이며새runtime실험/오늘운영995af의새검증·상류게시·merge를주장하지않는다. source/진단의COMPLETED·보관·W116제외·기술실패review97f2047a/cbc2bd22이력 및 다른원PR1/PR2/control_workflow_ids/사업보류·운영창·외부효과조건을보존한다. 기존정상flow writer로 이 동일 원단위의 completed종결만진행한다. 새source/worker/session·동일코드/시험/RV/빌드·운영DB/설정/프로세스·재시작/교체0. 원issue83후처리효과는기존flow계약안에서만,이미성립한효과재송신0.
이 artifact-note는 실제 receiving관제가 기존결과를이범위로수용한기록이다. 결속알림/전송접수/Plan존재를최종source결과로꾸미지않는다.

[8e receiving acceptance / AUTO-CONTINUE 기존 원단위] receiving_task=8e3eb6b7-f0fb-4d79-a954-69aeab00993a, currentSIDcd0c5763-321c-418f-97d8-2f23041bbbf0. 수용 대상 flow KANDEV-FU-1014-AUTO-CONTINUE, 기존 source c2374dc7-7b45-41a3-a6bd-60bc4027dce8:agent-delivery-648694917203e3abcb79f2b90241ab5e. 이번 원대화에서 실제 source최종보고(2026-10-20T21:57:53.9102285Z)를읽었고 원sourcePlan ec84c570 및 진단Plan e26ac412, cleanup a4b49c55 Plan c676cfc0의 최신 AUTO-CONTINUE 인수절을 대조했다. 기존수용ref 8e3eb6b7-f0fb-4d79-a954-69aeab00993a:agent-delivery-6347a4e7f0d37a12cc1f05fe3d21c2c9를 재사용한다. 범위: 기존 native scope3는 자동 continue 경로 부재에 따른 기결정 superseded이며 재구현하지 않는다. 남은 ceiling entry-drop의8a68c4b35/d086ca9f4/e82156721 수정·3cb독립검토필수0/9개기존사례·필요lint결과를기존증거로인수한다. K8 B1be 확정입력·canonical intake covered분류 및 기존source/runtime대장의backend반영 기록까지 이미receiving인수가끝난 사실을 source/cleanup최신절에서 확인했다. 옛K8반영대기나새운영재현/전분기자연발생을추가완료관문으로만들지 않는다. 받은원단위는 수정·기존통합/인수·정식큐후처리이며새runtime실험/오늘운영995af의새검증·상류게시·merge를주장하지않는다. source/진단의COMPLETED·보관·W116제외·기술실패review97f2047a/cbc2bd22이력 및 다른원PR1/PR2/control_workflow_ids/사업보류·운영창·외부효과조건을보존한다. 기존정상flow writer로 이 동일 원단위의 completed종결만진행한다. 새source/worker/session·동일코드/시험/RV/빌드·운영DB/설정/프로세스·재시작/교체0. 원issue83후처리효과는기존flow계약안에서만,이미성립한효과재송신0. 이 artifact-note는 실제 receiving관제가 기존결과를이범위로수용한기록이다. 결속알림/전송접수/Plan존재를최종source결과로꾸미지않는다.
dreampiler commented 2026-10-27 04:38:56 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

반영·정리 단계 완료 신호를 보냈습니다(accepted, advances).

  • K8 반영 대상 확정: 8a68c4b35, d086ca9f4, e82156721 (branch codex/kandev-fu-1014-ceiling-stale-route, base c905ca7ed)
  • 3cb75dea 검토 통과·필수 0, 이전 지적 4건 해소 확인, W116 제외 문서 유지
  • queue report-progress 1회(CALL-20261021-f1a275774bc8), 관제 보고 1회
  • fork PR/merge·상류 쓰기 없음. 남은 일은 K8의 claude/native-work 반영과 queue 종결(정리 담당)
반영·정리 단계 완료 신호를 보냈습니다(accepted, advances). - K8 반영 대상 확정: `8a68c4b35`, `d086ca9f4`, `e82156721` (branch `codex/kandev-fu-1014-ceiling-stale-route`, base `c905ca7ed`) - 3cb75dea 검토 통과·필수 0, 이전 지적 4건 해소 확인, W116 제외 문서 유지 - queue report-progress 1회(CALL-20261021-f1a275774bc8), 관제 보고 1회 - fork PR/merge·상류 쓰기 없음. 남은 일은 K8의 `claude/native-work` 반영과 queue 종결(정리 담당)
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
No items
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
dreampiler (dreampiler)
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: dreampiler/kandev#83
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?