Persistent Opus owner for approved upstream contributions #64

New Issue

2026-10-10T22:22:04+09:00

dreampiler commented

2026-10-10 22:22:04 +09:00

Owner goal: execute the owner-approved six-wave upstream contribution plan and keep all kdlbs/kandev GitHub interaction in one persistent, history-aware Opus conversation.
Observable result: approved comments/PRs are published only after historical review and applicable preparation/verification, each action is recorded in the canonical ledger and reported to operations, and maintainer follow-up continues in this same task/session.
queue: KANDEV-W-091
Title: Kandev 상류 GitHub 대응(전담)
This task remains open permanently. Do not call step_complete, move to Done, archive yourself, or replace this conversation between PRs. Use normal turn-end WAITING when waiting for a dependency, maintainer response or quota reset.

Execution contract:

Parent is the standing controller8e3eb6b7-f0fb-4d79-a954-69aeab00993a, Kandev workspace94852851-6893-4289-908a-53022d15fd68, repository068d4436-d120-42af-b178-8e1a45eb2279, explicit Worktree08eb0bba-37dc-459c-b34c-14322417bde7/new_workspace.
Fixed Opus profile7f2ec0a3-d27d-4976-b817-c25a741828b0, profile_explicit. No dynamic routing/fallback or another model at quota. Before any GitHub write confirm actual profile/runtime is Opus; if a parent snapshot, workflow override or model mismatch occurs, perform no write and report the exact receipt to parent. If quota-limited, keep this session/history and wait for reset; do not spawn another model/session.
This is the sole upstream writer: PR/issue creation, bodies/edits/comments, reviews/replies, closure/resubmission/security reports, and fork PRs connected to upstream submission. Routine unrelated fork PRs stay with their existing owners. Never delegate upstream submission or conversation.
Code preparation may be delegated to existing supported Kandev preparation tasks with explicit Worktree and normal workflow profiles: one PR/preparation task, no permanent tests beyond the approved source-adjacent regression tests, no shared Git ref writers. The platform allows one Kanban subtask level; if self placement makes preparation a sibling under the common standing controller, record its ID/ownership here and coordinate it, without reparenting the DB or inventing a hierarchy workaround.
Use only the assigned worktree; no shared checkout Git/file writes, second worktree, operating instance/DB/settings/process/OpenCode/VACUUM action, credential change, new schedule or audit framework.
New submission branches start from upstream/main, not forkmain. Port only approved fork commits/files via cherry-pick or manual rewrite; local build and affected package/source-adjacent tests before submission (no CI runners). Verify each preparation diff/result before publishing. Public text/diff must exclude local paths, operating ports, internal W IDs, secrets and Korean operational terminology.

Canonical history, mandatory before first action and on recovery:

D:\260720_Ai_Workspace_UserHub_desk\261010_upstream_proposal\proposal.md sections2(P01~P53, including lettered subitems) and4. Follow actual identifiers/rows; do not silently omit variants because the headline numbering stops at53.
D:\260720_Ai_Workspace_UserHub_desk\261008_upstream_posts: fork_remaining.md, October8 drafts a1~l, POSTED.log.
Read current upstream statuses and maintainer conversations for our22PRs/31issues using explicit --repo kdlbs/kandev. Operations supplied historical pointers, to refresh rather than blindly quote: #4015 led to maintainer implementation#4039; #4018 proposed Organization scope; #4330 said It's fine by me; #4045 has8maintainer commits/latestOct8; mistaken #4393/#4396 were closed after repository-default confusion.
Existing D:\260720_Ai_Workspace_UserHub_desk\261010_upstream_proposal\ledger.md. Controller Test-Path returnedFalse on initial registration; if still absent, create this specifically user-requested ledger after reading the source history. This is the sole history record for actions, not a new verification system. You alone append one line per action: UTC time, target number, Pnn, action, maintainer response, next action. Preserve prior lines; never overwrite the whole ledger or add fingerprints/hashes/signatures. Reading/writing this explicitly requested ledger is an authorized exception to the generic no-AIWS-file-write rule.
Owner approvals below. Operations' separate Opus audit of prior non-Opus posts is already running; do not duplicate it or edit those posts until concrete findings are handed to this task.

Approval transmission1 (exact full request and answer supplied by operations; source: operations chat2026-10-10 21:3x/21:5xKST):
Request:
「## 결정 요청 — 어디까지 올릴지
상류 PR은 소유자 결정 사항이라 범위를 정해 주세요.

(가) 전체 6차 계획을 승인하고 순서대로 진행 (추천)
- 1~4차 33개는 바로 진행합니다.
- 5차는 상류 최신판에서 결함을 다시 확인한 것만 올립니다.
- 6차는 이슈로 방향을 맞춘 뒤 올립니다.
- "최대한 싱크"라는 목표에 가장 맞습니다.
(나) 1~2차 17개(약 3,100줄)만 먼저 올리고, 결과를 보고 다음 차수를 다시 결정
(다) 차수마다 따로 승인

승인해 주시면 Kandev 관제에 작업으로 넘겨, 동기화가 끝난 뒤 1차부터 시작하겠습니다.」
Owner answer:
「일단 가) 로 진행 해.
추가로 동적 프로필 등급도 우리 작업한 내용을 먼저 올려 놓고, 개요화면도 kdlbs/kandev#4045 에 추가 pr 하는 건 별로일까?」
The extra questions were not implementation/publication approvals; approval2 resolves their proposed next actions.

Approval transmission2 (exact full request/answer supplied by operations; source: operations chat2026-10-10 21:5x/22:0xKST):
Request:
「## 결정 요청

(가) 위 추천대로 진행 (추천) — #3811에 참고 구현 공유 → 반응 보고 단계별 PR. #4045에는 댓글만 달고, 병합 뒤 후속 PR.
(나) 동적 등급만 진행하고 개요는 #4045 병합까지 대기
(다) 둘 다 지금은 보류

동적 등급 PR 준비는 상위 모델이 필요한 큰 작업이라, 12차 PR과 겹치지 않게 순서를 잡겠습니다.」
Owner answer:
「가) 1,2 모두 추천대로 진행해줘. 그리고 kandev 건으로 github 대응하는 작업은 가급적 동일한 모델이 지금까지의 히스토리를 인지한 상태에서 처리하도록 해줘.」
Operations' supplied recommendation summary (not an additional owner quote): D02 grade selection partly overlaps#3811; share a reference implementation first, and only after maintainer acceptance prepare34PRs (tier data/selection, usage-ratio selection, settingsUI, preview), excluding work-record docs. #4045 gets a comment only; after it merges submit #208 index then general duration statistics/execution-lane/failure classification pieces. Do not append overview code to#4045.

Permanent model instruction, exact owner quote/source operations chat2026-10-10 22:1xKST:
「혹시 opus 외 모델이 처리한 작업이나 작성한 글에 기존 내용과 맞지 않는 내용이나 잘못된 내용이 포함되지 않았는지 확인해줘. 앞으로 github 작업은 항상 opus 가 히스토리 확인 후 처리하도록 해줘.」

Approved first order:
a) After reading ledger/current#4045 conversation, post the proposal4.5 comment asking to merge the workspace-list scope first and leave Organization scope(#4018) as a follow-up. Its owner-answer gate is now satisfied; do not re-ask.
b) After current#3811 history, post a D02 reference-implementation comment. Explain same-profile alternative models versus tiered candidates across profiles with usage-ratio/order selection, behavior under feature switches, and concrete public fork commit/branch links. Present it as complementing#3811, ask whether staged PRs are welcome, and briefly include directly relevant D03 model-level quota suspension observations using verified historical evidence. No internal operational data or unsupported counts.
c) Only after W089 task8228ace3-e558-448c-8d32-9f255f3e5a1c actually merges the upstream-sync PR, begin wave1. Do not wait for installed-runtime replacement. The owner itself is not wholly blocked onW089 because comments a/b are independent. Do not register a second sync.
d) Follow proposal2/4 order,4~6PRs/day, never keep overlapping-file PRs open together. Conflict groups: P08/P13 manager_launch.go; P09/P10 rules.go; P04/P05/P16/P44 environment/executor files; P38/P45a/P52 ceiling_replay.go; P01/P46 idle files; P03/P52a route target; P31/P42 mcp/server. Wave5: only defects reverified on latest upstream. Wave6: issue/direction first per4.4 then small PR the same day; P44 needs schema explanation on#4322. Respect all other actual proposal details.
e) Dynamic tier PR preparation waits for#3811 acceptance and a non-overlap point with waves1/2. Overview follow-up waits for#4045 merge; retain its separate original scope.
f) Close fork PR#204 after verifying it duplicates merged#213. This cleanup is explicitly approved here and related to upstream P11; keep it in this dedicated owner. Do not close#216 or unrelated PRs.
g) Every upstream PR opened/merged/rejected or upstream action: append ledger first-class history and report one concise [→운영 세션] line with upstream number, wave/Pnn,status. Maintainer requests are handled in the same preparation work and this same submission conversation. Use body-file for multiline public bodies and read back live posts; do not infer posting from a local draft.

Commands: upstream submissions MUST explicitly use gh pr create --repo kdlbs/kandev --head dreampiler:. All other gh operations name the correct repository. Read existing thread before acting to avoid duplicate comments/submissions and contradicting history. No general approval prompt for already approved scope; actual new cost/credential/permission/nonrecoverable destructive change remains a separate boundary.
Completion of one action/PR is not completion of this persistent owner task. End your turn after bounded assigned work or a real dependency/quota wait, keeping ledger/current Plan and this exact session. Report blockers and next input without a new model, task, session or polling loop.

Owner goal: execute the owner-approved six-wave upstream contribution plan and keep all kdlbs/kandev GitHub interaction in one persistent, history-aware Opus conversation. Observable result: approved comments/PRs are published only after historical review and applicable preparation/verification, each action is recorded in the canonical ledger and reported to operations, and maintainer follow-up continues in this same task/session. queue: KANDEV-W-091 Title: Kandev 상류 GitHub 대응(전담) This task remains open permanently. Do not call step_complete, move to Done, archive yourself, or replace this conversation between PRs. Use normal turn-end WAITING when waiting for a dependency, maintainer response or quota reset. Execution contract: - Parent is the standing controller8e3eb6b7-f0fb-4d79-a954-69aeab00993a, Kandev workspace94852851-6893-4289-908a-53022d15fd68, repository068d4436-d120-42af-b178-8e1a45eb2279, explicit Worktree08eb0bba-37dc-459c-b34c-14322417bde7/new_workspace. - Fixed Opus profile7f2ec0a3-d27d-4976-b817-c25a741828b0, profile_explicit. No dynamic routing/fallback or another model at quota. Before any GitHub write confirm actual profile/runtime is Opus; if a parent snapshot, workflow override or model mismatch occurs, perform no write and report the exact receipt to parent. If quota-limited, keep this session/history and wait for reset; do not spawn another model/session. - This is the sole upstream writer: PR/issue creation, bodies/edits/comments, reviews/replies, closure/resubmission/security reports, and fork PRs connected to upstream submission. Routine unrelated fork PRs stay with their existing owners. Never delegate upstream submission or conversation. - Code preparation may be delegated to existing supported Kandev preparation tasks with explicit Worktree and normal workflow profiles: one PR/preparation task, no permanent tests beyond the approved source-adjacent regression tests, no shared Git ref writers. The platform allows one Kanban subtask level; if self placement makes preparation a sibling under the common standing controller, record its ID/ownership here and coordinate it, without reparenting the DB or inventing a hierarchy workaround. - Use only the assigned worktree; no shared checkout Git/file writes, second worktree, operating instance/DB/settings/process/OpenCode/VACUUM action, credential change, new schedule or audit framework. - New submission branches start from upstream/main, not forkmain. Port only approved fork commits/files via cherry-pick or manual rewrite; local build and affected package/source-adjacent tests before submission (no CI runners). Verify each preparation diff/result before publishing. Public text/diff must exclude local paths, operating ports, internal W IDs, secrets and Korean operational terminology. Canonical history, mandatory before first action and on recovery: 1. D:\260720_Ai_Workspace\_UserHub\_desk\261010_upstream_proposal\proposal.md sections2(P01~P53, including lettered subitems) and4. Follow actual identifiers/rows; do not silently omit variants because the headline numbering stops at53. 2. D:\260720_Ai_Workspace\_UserHub\_desk\261008_upstream_posts\: fork_remaining.md, October8 drafts a1~l, POSTED.log. 3. Read current upstream statuses and maintainer conversations for our22PRs/31issues using explicit --repo kdlbs/kandev. Operations supplied historical pointers, to refresh rather than blindly quote: #4015 led to maintainer implementation#4039; #4018 proposed Organization scope; #4330 said It's fine by me; #4045 has8maintainer commits/latestOct8; mistaken #4393/#4396 were closed after repository-default confusion. 4. Existing D:\260720_Ai_Workspace\_UserHub\_desk\261010_upstream_proposal\ledger.md. Controller Test-Path returnedFalse on initial registration; if still absent, create this specifically user-requested ledger after reading the source history. This is the sole history record for actions, not a new verification system. You alone append one line per action: UTC time, target number, Pnn, action, maintainer response, next action. Preserve prior lines; never overwrite the whole ledger or add fingerprints/hashes/signatures. Reading/writing this explicitly requested ledger is an authorized exception to the generic no-AIWS-file-write rule. 5. Owner approvals below. Operations' separate Opus audit of prior non-Opus posts is already running; do not duplicate it or edit those posts until concrete findings are handed to this task. Approval transmission1 (exact full request and answer supplied by operations; source: operations chat2026-10-10 21:3x/21:5xKST): Request: 「## 결정 요청 — 어디까지 올릴지 상류 PR은 소유자 결정 사항이라 범위를 정해 주세요. - **(가) 전체 6차 계획을 승인하고 순서대로 진행 (추천)** - 1~4차 33개는 바로 진행합니다. - 5차는 상류 최신판에서 결함을 다시 확인한 것만 올립니다. - 6차는 이슈로 방향을 맞춘 뒤 올립니다. - "최대한 싱크"라는 목표에 가장 맞습니다. - **(나) 1~2차 17개(약 3,100줄)만 먼저 올리고, 결과를 보고 다음 차수를 다시 결정** - **(다) 차수마다 따로 승인** 승인해 주시면 Kandev 관제에 작업으로 넘겨, 동기화가 끝난 뒤 1차부터 시작하겠습니다.」 Owner answer: 「일단 가) 로 진행 해. 추가로 동적 프로필 등급도 우리 작업한 내용을 먼저 올려 놓고, 개요화면도 kdlbs/kandev#4045 에 추가 pr 하는 건 별로일까?」 The extra questions were not implementation/publication approvals; approval2 resolves their proposed next actions. Approval transmission2 (exact full request/answer supplied by operations; source: operations chat2026-10-10 21:5x/22:0xKST): Request: 「## 결정 요청 - **(가) 위 추천대로 진행 (추천)** — #3811에 참고 구현 공유 → 반응 보고 단계별 PR. #4045에는 댓글만 달고, 병합 뒤 후속 PR. - **(나) 동적 등급만 진행하고 개요는 #4045 병합까지 대기** - **(다) 둘 다 지금은 보류** 동적 등급 PR 준비는 상위 모델이 필요한 큰 작업이라, 1~2차 PR과 겹치지 않게 순서를 잡겠습니다.」 Owner answer: 「가) 1,2 모두 추천대로 진행해줘. 그리고 kandev 건으로 github 대응하는 작업은 가급적 동일한 모델이 지금까지의 히스토리를 인지한 상태에서 처리하도록 해줘.」 Operations' supplied recommendation summary (not an additional owner quote): D02 grade selection partly overlaps#3811; share a reference implementation first, and only after maintainer acceptance prepare3~4PRs (tier data/selection, usage-ratio selection, settingsUI, preview), excluding work-record docs. #4045 gets a comment only; after it merges submit #208 index then general duration statistics/execution-lane/failure classification pieces. Do not append overview code to#4045. Permanent model instruction, exact owner quote/source operations chat2026-10-10 22:1xKST: 「혹시 opus 외 모델이 처리한 작업이나 작성한 글에 기존 내용과 맞지 않는 내용이나 잘못된 내용이 포함되지 않았는지 확인해줘. 앞으로 github 작업은 항상 opus 가 히스토리 확인 후 처리하도록 해줘.」 Approved first order: a) After reading ledger/current#4045 conversation, post the proposal4.5 comment asking to merge the workspace-list scope first and leave Organization scope(#4018) as a follow-up. Its owner-answer gate is now satisfied; do not re-ask. b) After current#3811 history, post a D02 reference-implementation comment. Explain same-profile alternative models versus tiered candidates across profiles with usage-ratio/order selection, behavior under feature switches, and concrete public fork commit/branch links. Present it as complementing#3811, ask whether staged PRs are welcome, and briefly include directly relevant D03 model-level quota suspension observations using verified historical evidence. No internal operational data or unsupported counts. c) Only after W089 task8228ace3-e558-448c-8d32-9f255f3e5a1c actually merges the upstream-sync PR, begin wave1. Do not wait for installed-runtime replacement. The owner itself is not wholly blocked onW089 because comments a/b are independent. Do not register a second sync. d) Follow proposal2/4 order,4~6PRs/day, never keep overlapping-file PRs open together. Conflict groups: P08/P13 manager_launch.go; P09/P10 rules.go; P04/P05/P16/P44 environment/executor files; P38/P45a/P52 ceiling_replay.go; P01/P46 idle files; P03/P52a route target; P31/P42 mcp/server. Wave5: only defects reverified on latest upstream. Wave6: issue/direction first per4.4 then small PR the same day; P44 needs schema explanation on#4322. Respect all other actual proposal details. e) Dynamic tier PR preparation waits for#3811 acceptance and a non-overlap point with waves1/2. Overview follow-up waits for#4045 merge; retain its separate original scope. f) Close fork PR#204 after verifying it duplicates merged#213. This cleanup is explicitly approved here and related to upstream P11; keep it in this dedicated owner. Do not close#216 or unrelated PRs. g) Every upstream PR opened/merged/rejected or upstream action: append ledger first-class history and report one concise [→운영 세션] line with upstream number, wave/Pnn,status. Maintainer requests are handled in the same preparation work and this same submission conversation. Use body-file for multiline public bodies and read back live posts; do not infer posting from a local draft. Commands: upstream submissions MUST explicitly use gh pr create --repo kdlbs/kandev --head dreampiler:<branch>. All other gh operations name the correct repository. Read existing thread before acting to avoid duplicate comments/submissions and contradicting history. No general approval prompt for already approved scope; actual new cost/credential/permission/nonrecoverable destructive change remains a separate boundary. Completion of one action/PR is not completion of this persistent owner task. End your turn after bounded assigned work or a real dependency/quota wait, keeping ledger/current Plan and this exact session. Report blockers and next input without a new model, task, session or polling loop.

dreampiler commented

2026-10-23 01:10:00 +09:00

[VER11-ALIGN-20261023] 최초 요청 원문·기존 flow/issue/이력 보존. 최신 기준 _Knowledge/references/최종목표구조설계_ver11/20_통합설계서.md 및 명세11/13/14, 절차·잔여·비용은42_현행정합_실행절차.md. 2026-10-23 읽기 관측 explicit task: 6f198197-cd2e-40d5-af27-fefd1d5813c6 (REVIEW, archived)
고정 Opus 전담은10/13 사용자 정정으로 동적 관제로 대체됨. 원6f198197 기록 보존, 현재5d5cbb5b-c908-401d-8e84-97f3fea8f7f0(93c6b4d0 부모) 기존 승인된 상류 쓰기 경로를 사용. 일반 queueflow를 영구 관제의 상태와 같게 바꾸지 않음.
이번 갱신은 결과/다음담당 연결이며 상태 일괄종결·task이동/삭제·모델순서/한도·상시시험·해시 확인 추가0.

[VER11-ALIGN-20261023] 최초 요청 원문·기존 flow/issue/이력 보존. 최신 기준 _Knowledge/references/최종목표구조설계_ver11/20_통합설계서.md 및 명세11/13/14, 절차·잔여·비용은42_현행정합_실행절차.md. 2026-10-23 읽기 관측 explicit task: 6f198197-cd2e-40d5-af27-fefd1d5813c6 (REVIEW, archived) 고정 Opus 전담은10/13 사용자 정정으로 동적 관제로 대체됨. 원6f198197 기록 보존, 현재5d5cbb5b-c908-401d-8e84-97f3fea8f7f0(93c6b4d0 부모) 기존 승인된 상류 쓰기 경로를 사용. 일반 queueflow를 영구 관제의 상태와 같게 바꾸지 않음. 이번 갱신은 결과/다음담당 연결이며 상태 일괄종결·task이동/삭제·모델순서/한도·상시시험·해시 확인 추가0.

dreampiler commented

2026-11-09 02:22:01 +09:00

2026-11-09 코드 수정 최소화 — 소유자 지시 접수: 코드 수정 작업 생성·재개 없음. 외부 대기 칸 코드 작업(3d5f0722 K18 · b9814c36 K22 · f9c7f223 P52b · 3dbd9243 P6) 재기동·이동·spawn_session 0, 상류 GitHub 공개 쓰기 중단(5d5cbb5b 포함). 재개 조건 = 소유자 재개 지시. 새 자식·queue 항목 0.

dreampiler commented

2026-11-09 04:33:56 +09:00

2026-11-09 소유자 「정리안대로 집행」 — 위 작업 보관, 상류·PR 작업은 외부 상류 PR 세션으로 이관(이관 표: 공유 노트 kandev-ws-cleanup-transfer-1109.md). p320 항목은 닫지 않고 보류. 재개는 소유자 코드 수정 재개 지시 뒤 필요한 것만.

Sign in to join this conversation.

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: dreampiler/kandev#64