자동 조립 동기화 설계 #182
Assignees
dreampiler (dreampiler)
Clear assignees
dreampiler (dreampiler)
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: dreampiler/kandev#182
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
사용자 승인 원문(2026-10-26 03:3x KST 진단세션 채팅, 현재 운영전달): 「제안 A(자동 조립 동기화)와 B(전용 항목 상류형 분리)를 Kandev 커스텀 관제 설계 작업으로 등록해서 진행해.」 정본 D:/260720_Ai_Workspace/_UserHub/_desk/261019_kandev_native_review/05-stage1-config-plan.md §13.44
13.45. parent3cb75dea-2d37-4a47-8709-7a2d1a885062. 설계 먼저, 구현은 설계 산출 뒤 자식 작업. 전체14/work10/control4와WIP·기존동적모델순서유지. 새구현writer/중복task·상시시험/감시·해시0. source/공용checkout/Gitref/운영플래그/스케줄/배포/자격쓰기0. 설계결과는 자기Native Plan의완결문서와같은queue p330에보존하고 parent3cb로실산출물/미완/다음실행을1회인계. 자기산출문서가필요하면 _UserHub/_task/kandev-custom-design/20261026의자기A또는B파일만사용; 지원권한없으면Plan원문으로이어가고부모가출력연결. 새승인대기/빈RV/가짜선행을추가하지않는다. 과거운영정지지시는해제됐으며WUC보류·기존비용/권한경계는유지. A 자동 조립 동기화 설계. 사실근거 A1A4 경과1020.7h/실활동0.88.5h는정본의집계로인수하고추가전수측정/감사체계0. 요구①codex/production을매일스크립트가 upstream/main→우리열린PR현재head정해진순서merge→빌드·초점시험→성공push로재조립,충돌PR만자식화 ②upstream/main변화시PRhead상시rebase·CI ③통합merge에는정식RV없음(내용PR의리뷰/CI와통합빌드·초점시험·교체readback구분) ④계획WIP대기제거안(WIP예외/전용workflow비교,운영상한14는보존) ⑤열림PR감소운영규칙. 기존Daily fork upstream sync 096cda6b와deploy-swap-restart §4의현재원문/역할을읽고대체·갱신설계. rebase가force-with-lease/게시전담과충돌할수있으므로파괴/게시권한을설계로확대하지말고현재승인·지원범위와실제필요행동을정확히분리. 매일automation/CI/push/실운영교체는이번설계턴에서켜지않는다. 산출①설계문서(입력PR목록·정렬·source단일writer·충돌처분·실패/되돌림·정식역할·2h목표) ②조립script위치/등록부행제안(아직등록/가동0) ③1회시범의실무인소요·충돌수. 시범은설계산출뒤의구현자식과의존순서를명시하고,이미지원되는안전한격리/무발행모드로설계실험1회가가능할때만실행. 새조립코드구현이필요하면설계먼저완성후부모에구체구현자식범위와시범수용조건을넘겨그결과까지이어받는다. 시범미실행을0충돌/성공으로꾸미거나산출요구에서빼지않는다. 첫산출은기동후60분내설계초안/현입구표를목표로하되실예상변화는근거로보고. 원Plan에실제설계문서를작성하고설계위한파일조회/공식자료/지원격리실험외제품소스수정0. B분리설계와겹치는공유파일/Gitref쓰기0.A task0e3194cd-31a2-40f4-97c1-9f21ef1abcd9 primarye1797f39 RUNNING/primary확인,실검색도구18:02:23Z관측. 조사설계기동완료·첫초안60분예상. 부모상속/Local환경실패는동일task지원API로new_workspace+Worktree정정,공용dirty보존. 설계/시범요구보존·구현/운영적용아직0.
Result-check handoff for KANDEV-A-DES-1026. Design artifact read back at Native Plan version 8bc4e98d-eb43-45d4-b18e-f934b1230bad. The full design follows unchanged. Pilot NOT EXECUTED; elapsed/unattended/operator time not measured; conflict count unknown. Overall flow must remain open. Existing parent handoff was committed/queued on 2026-10-25T18:06:46Z to task 3cb75dea-2d37-4a47-8709-7a2d1a885062, SID f5713e57-05cb-407c-93c3-c1cc012b7ef8, queue entry 9ea552a2-7d2e-4c91-bf29-00b7fa51c879; verified from original tool response in session e1797f39-dcc8-4cdb-98cc-86e1db72ae9b. No duplicate dispatch. Next actor: parent and existing CM source owner for A-WO1, then A-WO3 returns one measured no-publish pilot to this A task. No source, Git ref, automation, deployment or credential changes.
A: Daily production assembly and upstream synchronization
Status: design package ready; implementation and one-run pilot pending.
Queue: KANDEV-A-DES-1026. Task: 0e3194cd-31a2-40f4-97c1-9f21ef1abcd9.
Session: e1797f39-dcc8-4cdb-98cc-86e1db72ae9b.
Parent: 3cb75dea-2d37-4a47-8709-7a2d1a885062.
This Native Plan is the complete design artifact, as assigned. No repository documentation, product source, shared checkout, Git ref, schedule, runtime setting, credential or deployment is changed.
1. Provenance, authority and progress
The owner decision is recorded in D:/260720_Ai_Workspace/_UserHub/_desk/261019_kandev_native_review/05-stage1-config-plan.md §§13.44–13.45: register proposals A and B as custom-control design work, design first and implementation in child work. The supplied approval includes the owner statement but not the complete preceding approval question; this design does not extend it into publication, history rewriting or deployment authorization.
First tool: functions.exec, first shell output chunk ac33e4; clock observed 2026-10-25 18:01:54 UTC (2026-10-26 03:01:54 KST). First complete draft targeted within 60 minutes of that observation. The supplied source labels its decision 03:3x KST, later than this tool clock; preserve that provenance discrepancy without inventing a corrected time.
Initial git status --short: empty. Existing task plan: no plan exists. Prior failed-session history is retained.
Accepted historical baseline from the source: A1–A4 elapsed 10h/9h/11.5h/20.7h and activity 1.8h/0.8h/3.1h/8.5h. No new full audit or timing measurement was performed.
Completed: source recovery, current-entry inspection, requirements, system design, work orders.
Pending: implementation, pilot elapsed/unattended/operator time and conflict count, parent-owned p330 linkage, later authorized publication/activation.
2. Current entry points and concrete findings
3. Requirements and acceptance
REQ-A-001 / AC-A-001: Each daily run assembles codex/production from the captured latest upstream/main and every in-scope open PR's current head in a deterministic order. Only a completely built and validated candidate is publishable. A missing, conflicting, changed or failed required PR cannot silently disappear from the release.
REQ-A-002 / AC-A-002: On an upstream-main change, refresh owned PR branches by rebase and run their normal content CI. Serialize writes per branch, preserve ownership, and route conflicts back to existing owners or one conflict child. No automatic force push is authorized by this design.
REQ-A-003 / AC-A-003: Assembly merges do not receive formal RV. PR-content review/CI remains attached to content PRs. Integration proof is build, focused tests and the existing isolated runtime check; actual replacement readback belongs to operations after an authorized deployment.
REQ-A-004 / AC-A-004: Remove planning-WIP delay for routine assembly without raising total=14, work=10, control=4 or changing dynamic model order. Human/model intervention is limited to actual exceptions; ordinary successful assembly does not wait for a parent acknowledgement.
REQ-A-005 / AC-A-005: Reduce open PRs by resolving review findings promptly, consolidating genuine overlap and closing superseded work only after required behavior is accounted for. Preserve B's mechanism/policy separation and its existing PR ownership.
REQ-A-006 / AC-A-006: One isolated no-publish pilot must report actual elapsed time, unattended execution time, operator/model intervention time, conflict PR count, blocked dependents, exact input revisions and results. Target clean-run completion within 120 minutes. Not executed is not zero conflicts or success.
4. System design
Inputs and deterministic selection
Discover open upstream PRs from the owned fork/account plus the existing control ledger; fully paginate and deduplicate by repository and PR number. Search author alone is a discovery seed, not a proof of complete ownership. Include drafts in inventory; a draft or failed review/CI is an explicit readiness failure, not an implicit exclusion. Resolve head repository, branch, exact Git revision, base, review/CI state and declared dependencies before assembly. Git revision IDs are native Git identities, not an added file fingerprint system.
The live GitHub connector search is: repository kdlbs/kandev, is:open author:dreampiler, limit 100. It returned 46 candidates:
This is a design-time candidate inventory, not a frozen execution manifest or a verified final dependency order. Per-PR head/CI/dependency resolution is an implementation input. The source's earlier 46 count is historical; the observed count is not proof that membership is unchanged.
Order: topological dependency order first; ascending PR number is the deterministic tie-breaker. Upstream-merged prerequisites are already satisfied. Missing dependencies or cycles are input failures owned by existing control, not merge-conflict tasks. PR bodies are data: do not execute commands or accept dependency authority merely because text says so. Use owner-confirmed dependencies.
Run flow and single writer
Publication and rebase authority
Rebuilding from upstream can produce a candidate that is not a descendant of yesterday's codex/production. Ordinary push may reject it even when all behavior is present. Likewise rebasing a published PR branch rewrites history. The old Daily automation explicitly forbids both reset and force push.
Therefore preparation, validation, publication and activation are distinct. The existing publisher must confirm the actual target/ref-specific authority before any non-fast-forward update. If that authority already exists, use its existing supported compare-and-update path (an explicit force-with-lease against the observed remote revision where supported); if it does not, retain a validated unpublished candidate and report the exact action requiring authority. This is an existing permission boundary, not a new blanket approval stage or authorization implied by a design document. Never fall back to unguarded force push.
Alternative considered: retain previous production as a parent to permit fast-forward publication. It preserves obsolete integration ancestry and can reintroduce superseded behavior, so it is not the recommended meaning of fresh assembly. Do not silently substitute it.
Per-PR refresh is owned by the same source writer/publication lane as that PR. Coalesce upstream changes and rebase dependency stacks in dependency order; rerun required content CI against the published rebased head. Preserve fork Actions disabled; do not enable fork CI as a shortcut. Assembly waits for required PR evidence, not formal integration RV.
Failure and rollback
Input/API failures: preserve the last published production; report missing evidence and next actor.
Conflict: retain original refs and record one owner-directed remedy; no partial publish.
Build/test/runtime failure: retain last known good production; save concise failure and affected check, then rerun only after a relevant change.
Publisher lease mismatch: no retry with a widened lease; reread and coordinate with the existing writer.
Publication succeeds but deployment is deferred: report published/not installed.
Deployment fails: operations uses its existing binary backup/rollback and readback; do not reset source refs or restore a database automatically.
Candidate cleanup happens only in the assigned disposable path after useful result retention; no source branch/history destruction or shared worktree deletion.
WIP alternatives and selection
A planning-WIP exception in the current workflow is the smallest configuration change, but couples recurring mechanical work to general planning semantics and could accidentally bypass capacity limits.
A dedicated assembly workflow offers clearer admission and failure routing, but costs a workflow configuration and must not create another scheduler or model pool.
Recommendation: one dedicated routine-assembly path invoked by the existing Daily slot, concurrency one, bypassing only the planning queue. It consumes the same existing execution/capacity budget; total 14/work 10/control 4 and dynamic model order stay unchanged. Source/content conflicts use the normal workflow. The implementation must use supported configuration; if a dedicated path cannot preserve the limits, leave it proposed and use the existing path without changing limits. No workflow or scheduler is changed in this design turn.
Timing and open-PR rules
Budget proposal, not measurement: snapshot/admission 10 min, merges 20 min, dependency install/build 55 min, focused tests plus 15-minute runtime check 25 min, publication/readback 10 min = 120 min. Report capacity wait separately and include it in end-to-end elapsed; do not hide it to claim the target. Conflicts or authority limitations make the run incomplete and explain the missed target.
Upstream control handles review responses in its existing hourly work rhythm, not a new monitor. Before opening work, check an existing PR for the same behavior. Consolidation must preserve each required behavior and CI evidence; close a superseded PR only after the replacement mapping is established and the publisher acts. Remove upstream-merged PRs from the next open-PR inventory, with upstream code canonical. Keep small content PRs; B owns policy separation and modifications, A consumes their current heads.
5. Script and registration proposals (not registered)
Canonical proposal: Core_Manager _Manage_src/tools/kandev-watchdog/assemble_kandev_production.py. Execution-copy destination after normal CM promotion: D:/260720_Ai_Workspace/_Manage/tools/kandev-watchdog/assemble_kandev_production.py.
Proposed interface: --mode prepare --repo --manifest --output --no-publish. A separate publisher operation consumes the result; the script does not obtain new credentials or overwrite production refs implicitly.
The manifest contains repository identities, upstream revision, ordered PR numbers/heads/dependencies, required existing checks and output paths. Result contains outcome, timings, conflict PRs, skipped dependents and checked candidate revision. Reuse existing job records; no new audit platform, hash, signer or standing test suite.
Proposed logical registry row: existing Daily slot 096cda6b; daily 08:00 Asia/Seoul retained; purpose production assembly; concurrency 1; source writer existing native owner; exception destination general control with custom-control design linkage; publication 5d lane; deployment operations; enabled remains false until the later authorized activation. Resolve workflow/repository/parent empty fields through supported APIs during implementation/activation, not guesses. Do not create a second Daily scheduler or a duplicate CM timer.
Proposed upstream-change hook: reuse the existing upstream PR-management event/scheduling owner; enqueue refresh only when upstream revision changes. If a supported event inlet is unavailable, implementation must expose that gap and propose the smallest existing-scheduler integration; no new always-on polling service.
Operations documentation delta: preserve current §4 codex/production/all-heads/latest.json rules; replace §6's fork-main Daily invocation, reviewed-cut wording and formal integration-review assumption with the assembly/content-review/deployment split above. Preserve its existing runtime smoke and round-specific deployment authority. Operations owns canonical skill update and distribution; do not edit installed skill copies here.
6. Delivery work orders
All work orders are pending and sequential. These are specifications for parent assignment, not newly created tasks or writer allocations.
A-WO1, isolated assembly entry point. Requirements AC-A-001/003/006, design §4–5. Existing CM source owner implements input capture/order, isolated repo selection, deterministic merges, explicit conflict/dependent handling, build/check orchestration and no-publish result. Scope is the proposed script and minimal existing build-helper parameterization; no Kandev product source, permanent tests, runtime/registry mutation, publishing or B-owned files. Acceptance: all required inputs represented; failures cannot publish; successful result points to actual verified artifacts. Temporary scenario checks cover independent PRs, dependencies, conflicting PR, moved head and build failure. Exact future CLI is the §5 prepare invocation; command is a proposed interface, not presently runnable. Existing build commands: make build-web sync-embedded-web and make -C apps/backend build from the isolated root; pnpm run typecheck from isolated apps/web when required. The implementer records selected existing package test commands before execution.
A-WO2, existing-owner rebase/publication integration. Depends on WO1 for shared manifest/result contract. AC-A-002/004/005, §4–5. Publisher/source owner implements coalesced upstream refresh and per-branch serialization through current supported paths, preserves CI and authority boundaries, and prepares the existing Daily replacement configuration disabled. No direct credential/schedule activation or unauthorized non-fast-forward update. Acceptance: no competing writer; stale remote lease is rejected; no forced update without specific authority. Check through isolated repositories and the existing publisher's non-mutating supported path; if unsupported, preparation remains available and publication is explicitly pending, not simulated success.
A-WO3, one no-publish pilot. Depends only on WO1's working isolated path, not on live publication, deployment, new CI activation or unrelated B work. Use the captured real open-PR inventory and an isolated repository/build/home. Run the §5 prepare interface once, record start/end and interval-based unattended/operator/model time, conflict count and blocked dependents, build/test/runtime results. Do not count preliminary reading as pilot execution. Success requires all inputs, actual artifacts and focused/runtime checks; performance target is <=120 minutes for a clean run. A conflict run still produces a valid measured failure result but does not satisfy a successful clean assembly. Return to this original A task for result intake.
A-WO4, later activation and deployment handoff. Depends on WO2 and WO3 evidence. The parent and established operations/publisher owners act only within existing explicit authority. Update the existing Daily configuration and canonical operations instructions, then separately schedule authorized replacement/readback. This turn creates no automation, child, CI run, push or deployment.
7. Pilot result and handoff
Pilot status: NOT EXECUTED. Elapsed time: not measured. Unattended time: not measured. Operator/model intervention time: not measured. Conflict PR count: unknown. Do not report zero or success.
Reason: the inspected build helper is tied to the shared repository and contains neither assembly nor an isolated no-publish mode; the disabled Daily prompt is an agent-driven fork-main publication flow, not a safe substitute. A supported suitable entry point was not found in the scoped tool inspection. Creating the missing assembly code is WO1 implementation, outside this design turn.
Next actor: parent assigns WO1 to the existing source owner through the existing queue/workflow; no duplicate writer. Then WO3 returns measured results to this task. WO2 can prepare the later authority-aware publication path without blocking a no-publish pilot. Parent preserves this full Native Plan in the same queue's p330 using its established flow writer. No direct p330 file writes are allowed here.
Design handoff is ready; overall A result remains incomplete until the one-run pilot is incorporated. No step-completion signal is justified for the entire assignment at this point.
KANDEV-A-DES-1026 requirement correction; Native Plan task 0e3194cd-31a2-40f4-97c1-9f21ef1abcd9 version b2dfff33-f4a4-494f-94f4-8139b6607617. Removes the historical 15-minute runtime-smoke obligation and any new approval for removing it. Integration validation is build + focused tests + actual replacement readback at authorized deployment. Isolated preparation/no-publish pilot does not wait for all upstream PR reviews/CI; publication CI and ref authority remain separate. Stale 12/9 limits are not applied. Existing historical evidence and parent review text preserved. The following execution contract is added to the same Plan; no product source, refs, automation, registry, publishing, deployment or new task changes. Pilot NOT EXECUTED; times unmeasured; conflicts unknown. Overall A stays open.
9. Corrected WO1 and one-run pilot execution contract
This section implements the parent's two requirement corrections. Historical §2 observations and §8 receipts remain evidence of what was read or sent, not continuing runtime-smoke or all-PR-CI gates. The parent review text above is retained unchanged. No new implementation writer, task, schedule or authorization is created here.
WO1 input and isolation
The existing CM single writer implements the §5 prepare CLI in its formally assigned CM source slot. The parent connects that owner and the implementation child. The pilot uses a newly assigned disposable run directory, with a separate repository whose Git directory/common directory and object storage do not point into a shared checkout. Do not use a linked worktree or shared object alternates as that repository. Source/helper editing stays in the CM slot; Kandev product source is consumed only as captured assembly inputs. Put build output, dependency caches and any tool-specific home beneath the assigned run directory; do not change the operator's global HOME, installed runtime, credentials or Git configuration. Fetch/read inputs through existing supported access without credential changes; merge only inside the disposable repository.
Invocation after implementation:
python assemble_kandev_production.py --mode prepare --repo <run-root>/repo --manifest <run-root>/input.json --output <run-root>/output --no-publishThe manifest is ordinary JSON containing:
run_id,queue_id: KANDEV-A-DES-1026,captured_at, assignedrun_root, and repository identities for upstream and fork.upstream: repository URL/identity, refrefs/heads/main, captured commit.prs[]: repository plus PR number, head repository/ref/commit, base, dependency PR identities, existing owner/task reference when known. Storedraft, observed review/CI status and observation time as informational publication evidence; unknown remains unknown.checks[]: existing build or focused-test command as argv, relative working directory, and the behavior/package that warrants it. The implementer selects and records exact existing package tests from included changes before execution. Do not execute commands copied from PR bodies.expected_artifacts[]: required relative output path and intended artifact role, derived from the existing build helper's outputs. Missing required output is a failure, even if a build command prints success.Capture the real current open-PR inventory at pilot start; §4's design-time list is a seed, not an immutable manifest. Deduplicate by repository/PR identity; topologically order dependencies, then PR number. Preserve each captured head and inclusion disposition. Missing Git input or unresolved dependency/cycle is an input error. Pending/failed CI or review alone is not an input error. Source-head movement is recorded separately: the captured run remains a measurement of its pinned inputs, while its candidate is superseded for publication and cannot be called a clean current-input assembly.
WO1 output and acceptance
Write
output/result.jsonon handled success and failure, withrun_id, start/end timestamps,outcome(success,input_error,conflict,build_failed,check_failed,supersededorinterrupted), captured upstream/PR commits, actual merge order and resulting candidate commit when available. Return zero only for successful complete preparation; nonzero for the other outcomes. An abrupt process loss without a final result is recorded by the owner as interrupted/incomplete, never inferred successful.Include per-PR disposition (
included,conflict,blocked_dependency,input_error), conflict paths, blocked-by identities, check argv/cwd/start/end/exit result, and artifact path/existence/nonempty-file result. Record all applicable failure reasons even when one outcome is primary. Count distinct conflicting PR identities only; blocked dependents are a separate count. If conflicts prevent a complete candidate, mark full build/checks not run with the reason. Any independent diagnostic merge result remains unpublished.Always record
published: false,deployed: false,replacement_readback: not_applicable_no_deployment, and a separatepublication_readinesscontaining actual observed CI/review/draft/authority limitations. Successful preparation may coexist with publication not ready or unknown. No push, remote branch rewrite, CI activation or registry/schedule mutation is part of this entry point.Validate actual expected artifacts in the isolated output location and inspect the existing build/focused-check results. Temporary scenarios for independent heads, dependencies, merge conflict, moved head and build failure remain inside the assigned temporary area, excluded from standing test discovery. They validate WO1; they are not additional real inventory pilots or permanent tests.
WO3 measured run and return
After WO1 is usable, run the captured real inventory once through the prepare CLI. WO2, every PR's CI/review completion, fork CI activation, production publication/deployment and B completion are not prerequisites. Record the pilot start at CLI launch and end after result/artifact inspection and owned-resource cleanup; report any capacity wait separately as well as in end-to-end elapsed. Preliminary design reading and WO1 implementation are not pilot execution.
In the same result/job record, record timestamped activity intervals with
kind(unattended,operator,model) and a short activity/reason. Compute unattended wall time from intervals with execution and no intervention; compute intervention wall time as the union of operator/model intervals, and report their individual durations separately so overlaps are not double-counted in elapsed. Unknown intervals stay unknown; tool wait time is not proof of unattended work. Use ordinary timestamps and existing records, with no new monitor or audit service.Return to this original A task: the input snapshot, result path, actual build/focused-check outcomes, verified artifact locations, elapsed/unattended/operator/model durations, distinct conflicting PR count, blocked dependents and remaining publication limitations. Retain the compact manifest/result and necessary failure evidence in the assigned existing job location, remove only owned temporary resources when no longer needed, and link the evidence through the existing flow writer. No new hash/signature or standing test is introduced.
Current pilot remains NOT EXECUTED; all times are unmeasured and conflict count is unknown. The parent connects the existing CM owner for WO1 plus this one pilot. A remains incomplete until the real pilot result is returned and assessed; this correction is not an overall completion signal.
감시후부모전체설계인수. pilot NOT EXECUTED로전체A미완. A③한정과충돌하는15분smoke강제/옛조건재승인·상류CI준비barrier를정정하도록같은A재개, currentprimarye1d12204 RUNNING/18:25:12Z실조회확인. 설계정정뒤원A-WO1+1회무발행시범구현을부모가연결. 제품소스/운영쓰기·새task중복0.
원A/부모의metrics정정요청은원0a 1회결과로합쳐수용. 93매핑 #4628W106/#4712W112원내용완료·공통파일조립해소는기존8elane에연결,실task/SID/도구pointer요청. 옛운영미포함/opt-in대기복원0. 이번설계의1회conflict측정수용과clean2h/운영미증명을분리·새cleanrun종결gate0.
Original A assessment: corrected single no-publish conflict pilot accepted as a bounded design/measurement deliverable. Read pilot-record.json and result.json under _Runtime/tmp/kandev-a-wo1-1026-pilot-20261025T190313Z. 49 inputs, 38 included, 11 distinct conflicts. Build/checks not run; no artifacts; published/deployed false. CLI elapsed 211.631 s; script timestamp span 211.476 s; reported script duration 211.481 s. Exact end-to-end and model/unattended time unknown. Owner-recorded execution-order bounds give total 426.797-472.237 s; unattended estimate 204.476 s; model bounds approximately 7.155-267.761 s, not confirmed active time. Operator intervention recorded zero. All dependency arrays are capture placeholders, so zero blocked dependents is declared-graph only. Timing correction accepted with uncertainty retained; no rerun or further correction requested. Successful complete assembly, clean-run 2h target, publication and deployment remain unproved and belong to the existing parent/assembly lane. Do not close overall A on this acceptance.
Current #4715 conflict owner linked: KANDEV-4715-BASE-1026 task4c9f39e0-e4b2-464e-8e39-cd6fbe03308c/SIDa1f08f3f-f5b7-42b9-89d0-9b6e360558a8 RUNNING confirmed by official API; original conversation first gitstatus tool agent-delivery-shell-226b03faff9f719ab86e25be492067c9 at19:26:33.3137643Z observed. Source p330 binding readback confirmed. This resolves owner/start pointer only, not conflict/RV/PR update. Other10 assembly remains existing archived A4 operating recovery and shared-file sequencing; no duplicate source/pilot/RV. Source WO1 closed/completed and original pilot measurement acceptance unchanged.
3cb directly read #4715 formal RV320590 completed APPROVE/findings0 and parent acceptance note195407365226Z/path-release record. Live official GitHub PR4715 now OPEN/head38dacc60a39b047c2048cc503adb38d2a47af8de/base62af870aea3556e34ae3878041d2b99bf1c522bc/mergeable true/state blocked. Correct head-update-unknown only; blocked is not CI/review/upstream merge or assembly success. Existing8e notified95e9aecc sent to consume original5d publisher receipt and original flow settlement, no duplicate publish/RV/pilot. Other10 assembly remains archived A4 recovery/sequencing, overall A incomplete.
Original5d publisher conversation d60386c127b5129da394c8f91aa82768 and follow-up2ddeee0561560a482faa9132991f7564 read; FF publication to original PR4715/head38dacc and MERGEABLE/BLOCKED agree with previous direct GitHub readback. Final parent acceptance note195824680525Z read. Source4715 p330 last acceptance observed, closure not yet observed; existing8e/source owns settlement, no duplicate close. Remaining10 assembly uses archived originalA4 f0de6e21 after operating recovery, then current manifest/build; shared locale/config reservations released. No repeat publication/RV/tests/pilot; overall A remains incomplete.
Parent final design-unit acceptance: original plan4e2e47f5 sections13-14 and final agent-delivery-567cfeb1688314fa8c972a78137fe9fc read; WO1 predecessor COMPLETED/resolved. Complete design, script/registry proposal and one measured conflict pilot accepted:49 inputs38 included11 conflicts, no build/artifacts/publication, exact overall/model/unattended time unknown. Native design task moved Done. No later clean run or operating activation added as design closure prerequisite. Automation program remains incomplete: WO2 refresh/publication connection and WO4 activation/clean2h goal; remaining10 assembly belongs existing archived A4 f0de6e21 via operating recovery and8e single writer. No new task/source/pilot/RV/publish/deploy.
WO1 jobsheet의 실제 종결을 확인하고 원 A Plan §14에 반영했습니다.
설계·1회 충돌 시범 산출은 수용 완료입니다. WO2, 자동화 활성화, 11개 충돌의 후속 담당 연결은 별도로 남아 있으며, A 전체 완료로 처리하지 않았습니다.