dreampiler/kandev
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 43 Pull Requests Actions 6 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Review wrong waits and recurrence prevention in new workflows #115

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-10-15 03:07:29 +09:00 by dreampiler · 1 comment
dreampiler commented 2026-10-15 03:07:29 +09:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

One atomic read-only investigation and proposal requested by the human in AIWS work-management chat on 2026-10-15. Compare six concrete wrong-wait cases against approved goals, live new workflows, unassembled source parts, unmerged CM1145 and draft329, installed94 and existing30da/44 fixes. Cases: over-broad dependencies and managerial interpretations; omitted repository/profile and wrong initial entry; cancelled primary despite a live replacement; durable turn/runtime/route and stop ownership conflicts; preparation-complete enums confused with operational completion; redundant step signals and reviews. Include the observed P31 immutable initial-session binding selecting old9fa again after recoveryed647: preserve original immutable history, consider a registered recovery-replacement binding instead of retagging the initial record. Preserve original goals and valid external/approval waits. No production/prompt/runtime/profile changes, new guard, standing test, benchmark, poller, new approval system or duplicate implementation. Use existing records, actual transitions and outputs; distinguish platform defects from prompt/configuration errors and causal claims from incomparable samples. Produce six-case evidence/cause/prevention verdict/minimum correction location/cost/false-positive/remaining limits and summary at _UserHub/_desk/261001_mpm_ops_handoff/sent/codex_workflow_wait_rootcause_review_1015.md; update only this queue/jobsheet and own Plan. Full human quotations and private handoff: _UserHub/_desk/261001_mpm_ops_handoff/sent/codex_hold_followthrough_workflow_review_1015.md. Source-only review, not authorization to apply any proposed changes.

One atomic read-only investigation and proposal requested by the human in AIWS work-management chat on 2026-10-15. Compare six concrete wrong-wait cases against approved goals, live new workflows, unassembled source parts, unmerged CM1145 and draft329, installed94 and existing30da/44 fixes. Cases: over-broad dependencies and managerial interpretations; omitted repository/profile and wrong initial entry; cancelled primary despite a live replacement; durable turn/runtime/route and stop ownership conflicts; preparation-complete enums confused with operational completion; redundant step signals and reviews. Include the observed P31 immutable initial-session binding selecting old9fa again after recoveryed647: preserve original immutable history, consider a registered recovery-replacement binding instead of retagging the initial record. Preserve original goals and valid external/approval waits. No production/prompt/runtime/profile changes, new guard, standing test, benchmark, poller, new approval system or duplicate implementation. Use existing records, actual transitions and outputs; distinguish platform defects from prompt/configuration errors and causal claims from incomparable samples. Produce six-case evidence/cause/prevention verdict/minimum correction location/cost/false-positive/remaining limits and summary at _UserHub/_desk/261001_mpm_ops_handoff/sent/codex_workflow_wait_rootcause_review_1015.md; update only this queue/jobsheet and own Plan. Full human quotations and private handoff: _UserHub/_desk/261001_mpm_ops_handoff/sent/codex_hold_followthrough_workflow_review_1015.md. Source-only review, not authorization to apply any proposed changes.
dreampiler commented 2026-10-15 03:26:42 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Read-only six-case root-cause review completed. Result: _UserHub/_desk/261001_mpm_ops_handoff/sent/codex_workflow_wait_rootcause_review_1015.md; Kandev task 63934845-0faf-441c-8f92-7018819c1396 and its existing Plan. New workflows provide partial prevention, not complete recurrence protection. Remaining concrete issues: callable MCP field mismatch in live/CM1145 register text; separate control startup; P31 registered recovery-replacement binding absent. Preserve immutable initial history and committed routes. Retain 30da/44e native owners and distinguish candidate protection from installed94. No source/prompt/config/runtime changes, new gate/test/poller or duplicate implementation. Proposals unapplied; parent operating goals remain. Parent report will identify the same artifact and scope. No performance superiority claimed.

Read-only six-case root-cause review completed. Result: _UserHub/_desk/261001_mpm_ops_handoff/sent/codex_workflow_wait_rootcause_review_1015.md; Kandev task 63934845-0faf-441c-8f92-7018819c1396 and its existing Plan. New workflows provide partial prevention, not complete recurrence protection. Remaining concrete issues: callable MCP field mismatch in live/CM1145 register text; separate control startup; P31 registered recovery-replacement binding absent. Preserve immutable initial history and committed routes. Retain 30da/44e native owners and distinguish candidate protection from installed94. No source/prompt/config/runtime changes, new gate/test/poller or duplicate implementation. Proposals unapplied; parent operating goals remain. Parent report will identify the same artifact and scope. No performance superiority claimed.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
No items
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
dreampiler (dreampiler)
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: dreampiler/kandev#115
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?